Atherley, C. A. (1989). Shared reading: An experiment in peer tutoring in the primary classroom. Educational Studies, 15(2), 145-153. EJ 397 177

Baker, E.A. (2000, July). Instructional approaches used to integrate literacy and technology. Reading Online, 4(1). Available: http://www.readingonline.org/articles/baker/

Barley, Z., Lauer, P.A., Arens, S.A., Apthorp, H.S., Englert, K.S., Snow, D., & Akiba, M. (2002). Helping at-risk students meet standards: A synthesis of evidence-based classroom practices (REL Deliverable #2002-20). Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. Available: www.mcrel.org.

Baxter, G.P., & Shavelson, R.J. (1994). Science performance assessments: Benchmarks and surrogates. International Journal of Educational Research, 21, 279-298.

Becker, H.J. & Lovitts, B. E. (2003). A project-based approach to assessing technology. In D.

Haertel, & B. Means (Ed.), Evaluating Educational Technology: Effective Research Designs for Improving Learning (pp. 129-148). New York: Teachers College Press.

Benard, B. (1990). The Case for Peers. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. ED 327 755

Bennett, D. & Hawkins, J. (1992, March). Alternative assessment and technology. News from the Center for Children and Technology and the Center for Technology in Education, Vol. 1, No. 3, Bank Street College of Education. Modified in ERIC Digest, 1994 (ericdigest.org/1994/technology.html)

Bernstein, S., Boquien, C., & Cho, A., (1997). Keeping Cross-age Tutoring Alive: Growing and Sustaining a School-wide Tutoring Program. Partners in School Innovation, An AmeriCorps Program.

Bloom, B. S. (1984, May). The search for methods as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 4-17. EJ 299 535

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369-398.

Boaler, J. (1997). Reclaiming school mathematics: the girls fight back. Gender and Education, 9(3), 285-305.

Bozeman W.C. (1999), Educational technology: Best practices from America’s schools (2nd Edition). Larchmont, New York: Eye on Education, Inc.

Brendtro, L. K. (1999, June). Tools for reclaiming at-risk youth. Keynote presentation at the 8th Annual Rocky Mountain Regional Conference in Violence Prevention in Schools and Communities, Denver.

Brendtro, L. K., Brokenleg, M., & VanBockern, S. (1992). Reclaiming youth at risk: Our hope for the future. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.

Caine, G., & Caine, R. N. (1997). Education on the edge of possibility. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Calvert, M. (2002, April). Raising voices in school: The impact of young decision-makers on schools and youth organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Cardona, C., & Artiles, A.J. (1998, April). Adapting classwide instruction for student diversity in math. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Minneapolis. CARET (2004). Center for Applied Research in Educational Technology, Referenced in http://www.people.memphis.edu/~coe_crep/index.htm

Center for Research in Educational Policy (1999). http://www.people.memphis.edu/~coe_crep/index.htm

Clarke, D. (2002, April). Learner’s perspective study: Exploiting the potential for complementary analyses. Paper presented as part of the symposium, “Primary Research, Secondary Research and research Synthesis,” at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Coe, M. T. (2003, September). Students, teachers, and technology building better schools: Generation Y Project Evaluation. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Available: http://genyes.org/products/geny/genyresearch

Coe, M. T., & Ault, P. C (2001, September). Students, teachers, and technology building better schools: Generation Y Project Evaluation. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C-L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of peer tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237-248. EJ 272 101

Coley, R. J., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. K. (1996). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools (Policy information report). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3-14.

Curwin, R.L. & Mendler, A.N. (1999). Zero tolerance for zero tolerance. Phi Delta Kappan, 18 (2), 119-120.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

DePaulo, B. M., Tang, J., Webb, W., Hoover, P., Marsh, K., & Litowitz, C. (1989, April). Age differences in reactions to help in a peer tutoring context. Child Development, 60(2), 423-439. EJ 387 666

Diamond, M., & Hopson, J. (1998). Magic trees of the mind. New York: Dutton.

Education Development Center. (1994). Union City Interactive Multimedia Education Trial: 1993-1994 summary report. New York: Educational Development Center. Education Place (1997). Student self-assessment. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Retrieved from http://www.eduplace.com/rdg/res/assess/index.html

Elliot, J. (1994). Orientation and transition takes more than a week. Journal of Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association, 3, 15-19.

Ericson, D. P., & Ellet, F. S., Jr. (2002, April). The question of the student in educational reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Ezarik, M. (2004, April). Testing: Uno, Dos, Tres!. District Administration, 38.

Fielding, M. (2000). The person centred school. Forum, 42(2), 51-54.

Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(3), 123-141.

Fielding, M. (2002, April). Beyond the rhetoric of student voice: New departures or new constraints in the transformation of 21st century schooling? Paper presented as part of the International Symposium on Student Voices and Democracy in Schools at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Fielding, M. (in press). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinning, recalcitrant realities. The McGill Journal of Education.

Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18, 27-32.

Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Phillips, N.B., Hamlett, C.L., A& Karns, K. (1995). Acquisition and transfer effects of classwide peer-assisted learning strategies in mathematics for students with varying learning histories. School Psychology Review, 24(4), 604-620.

Gao, X., Shavelson, R.J., & Bater, G.P. (1994). Generalizability of large-scale performance assessments in science: Promises and problems. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 323-342.

Gartner, A. & Riessman, F. (1993). Peer-tutoring: Toward a new model, ERIC Digest. ED362506

Gartner, A. (1992). A peer-centered school. New York: Peer Research Laboratory.

GLEF (2001). Project-Based Learning Research. George Lucas Education Foundation. Retrieved from http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:_SzwwHzC5vIJ:www.glef.org/php/print.php%3Fid%3DArt_887%26template%3Dprintarticle.php+%22Co-nect+schools+outperformed
+control%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a

GLEF (2004). Visions of a possible future. George Lucas Education Foundation interview with Seymour Papert. Retrieved from http://glef.org/php/interview.php?id=Art_901&key=037

Goldman, G. & McCombs, B. L. (2002), “Using New Educational Technologies to Empower Youth: The Power of Youth-Adult Partnerships in e-Learning.” New Horizons for Learning, Seattle, Washington

Goodlad, S., & Hirst, B. (1989). Peer tutoring: A guide to learning by teaching. New York: Nichols Publishing. ED 311 006

Goodrich, H. (1996, December-1997, January). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 14-17.

Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1989, September). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 371-383. EJ 399 801

Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., & Hall, R.V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychology Review, 17(21), 258-275.

Hall, J.C. (2003). Mentoring and young people: A literature review. SCRE Research Report 114. Available from University of Glasgow web site: http://www.scre.ac.uk/resreport/index.html

Hall, R. (2000). The first year experience at university. A study of transition to university in arts and science students at the University of New South Wales. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences and Science and Technology, University of New South Wales.

Harper, D. (1998, May). Generation Y: Second annual report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Harper, D. (2002, March). Generation Y White Paper 2. Olympia, WA: Generation Y Organization.

Hedin, D. (1987). Students as teachers: A tool for improving school climate and productivity. Social Policy, 17(3), 42-47. EJ 355 106

Herman, J.L., Aschbacher, P.R., & Winters, L. (1992). Select and/or design assessments that elicit established outcomes. In A Practical Guide to Alternative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Hibbald, K.M., VanWagenen, L., Lewbel, S., Waterbury-Wyatt, S., Shaw, S., Pelletier, K,.,

Larkins, B., O”Donnell Dolling, J., Elia, P., Palma, S., Maier, J., Johnson, D., Honan, M., McKeon Nelson, D., Wislocki, J., A Teacher’s Guide to Performance-Based Learning and Assessment, Alexandria, VA, Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1996.

Hyman, I.A. & Snook, P.A. (2000). Dangerous schools and what you can do about them. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(7), 489-501.

Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 505-532.

Jester, R. (2002). If I had a hammer: Technology in the language arts classroom. English Journal, 91(4), 85-88.

Johnson, J. (1987). Adaptation of curriculum, instructional methods, and materials component: Instructional aide program. Final Evaluation Report. Columbus, OH: Columbus Public Schools.

Kenney, D. J., & Watson, T. S. (1999). Crime in the Schools: Reducing fear and disorder with student problem solving. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.

Kilpatrick, W.H. (1918). The Project Method. Teachers College Record, 26-33. Also reprinted in Schultz, F. (Ed.) Sources: Notable Selections in Education. Guilford, CT: The Dushkin Publishing Group.

Koretz, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., McCaffrey, D., & Diebert, E. (1993). Can portfolios assess student performance and influence instruction? The 1991-92 Vermont experience. Washington, DC: RAND Institute on Education and Training and Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.

Kulieke, M., Bakker, J., Collins, C., Fennimore, T., Fine, C., Herman, J., et al. (1990). Why Should Assessment be Based on a Vision of Learning?. Naperville, IL: NCREL. Lambert, N. & McCombs, B. L. (Eds.) (1998). How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. Washington, DC: APA Books.

Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55(1), 170-183.

Lehrer, R., Erickson, J., & Connell, T. (1994). Learning by designing hypermedia documents. Computers in Schools, 10(1-2), 227-254.

McCombs, B. L. (2001a). Selfregulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-Regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (2nd. Ed.) (pp. 67-123). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

McCombs, B. L. (2001b, September). The learner-centered framework on teaching and learning as a foundation for electronically networked communities and cultures. Paper prepared for the PT3 Vision Quest on Assessment in e-Learning Cultures. Denver, CO: University of Denver. Also available at http://www.pt3.org/VQ/

McCombs, B. L. (in press). Applying educational psychology’s knowledge base in educational reform: From research to application to policy. In W. M. Reynolds and G. E. Miller (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology, Volume 7: Educational Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McCombs, B. L. (2003), “A Framework for the Redesign of K-12 Education in the Context of Current Educational Reform,” The Ohio State University, College of Education, Gale Group.

McCombs, B.L. (2002), “The Learner-Centered Framework: A Research-Validated Rational for Defining Healthy Educational Environments,” Talking Paper for Education Committee Hearing, February 27, 2002, Sacramento, California, American Sports Institute.

McGrath, D, et al. (2003, November). Building better projects, Leading and Learning with Technology, 31(3), 32-38.

McTighe, J. (1996, December-1997, January). What happens between assessments?. Educational Leadership, 6-12.

Means, B., and Olson, K. (1994, April). The link between technology and authentic learning. Educational Leadership, pp. 15-18.

Means, B. & Olson, K. (1995). Technology and education reform: Technical research report, Volume 1: Findings and Conclusions (OERI). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Means, B. & Olson, K. (1997). Technology and education reform (ORAD 96-1330). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.

Mitra, D. L. (2002, April). Makin’ it real: Involving youth in school reform. Paper presented in the International Symposium on “Student Voices and Democracy in Schools” at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

Nissen, L. B. (1999, June). The power of the strength approach. Keynote presentation at the 8th Annual Rocky Mountain Regional Conference in Violence Prevention in Schools and Communities, Denver.

Noguera, P. A. (1995). Preventing and producing violence: A critical analysis of responses to school violence. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 189-212.

Norris, T. (1999, June). Healthy communities for healthy youth. Keynote presentation at the 8th Annual Rocky Mountain Regional Conference in Violence Prevention in Schools and Communities, Denver.

Overholtzer, J and Tombarge, J. (2002, October). Using peer mentors to promote information fluency: Final report. Presentation at annual EDUCAUSE conference.

Peer Systems Consulting Group, 2000, “The Myths of Mentoring”, Peer Systems Consulting Group, Inc., http://www.mentors.ca/mentormtyhs.html.

Penuel, W.R. and Means, B. (2000). Observing classroom processes in project-based learning using multimedia: A tool for evaluators. Palo Alto, California: Center for Technology in Learning SRI International. Available on-line at: http://www.ed.gov/Technology/TechConf/1999/whitepapers/paper3.html

Powell, M. A. (October, 1997) Academic Tutoring and Mentoring: A Literature Review, California Research Bureau, California State Library, CRB-97-011.

Rawcliffe, F.W. (1925). Practical problem projects. Chicago: F. E. Compton & Company.

Riessman, F. (1991). Plotting a thematic third stage of reform. Education Week, 10(37), 27, 29.

Riessman, F. (1990). Restructuring help: A human services paradigm for the 1990s. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(2), 221-230.

Rockman ET AL (2000, June). A More Complex Picture: Laptop Use and Impact in the Context of Changing Home and School Access. San Francisco: Rockman ET AL.

Rogers, C., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd Ed.). New York: Merrill.

Rohrbeck, C.A., Ginsburg-Block, M.D., Fantuzzo, J.W., & Miller, T.R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240-257.

Rosner, R. (1997). Students teaching students: A handbook for cross-age tutoring. AmeriCorps Center for School Success, Resourcebook 1. Atlanta, GA: Partners in School Innovation.

Rudduck, J., Day, J., & Wallace, G. (1997). Student perspectives on school improvement. In 1997 ASCD Yearbook: Rethinking educational change with heart and mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Rudner, L. and Boston, C. (n.d.). A Long Overview of Alternative Assessment. Available from: gopher://vmsgopher.cua.edu/00gopher_root_eric_ae%3A%5B_alt%5D_overv.txt

Ryser, G. R, Beeler, J. E., & McKenzie, C. M. (1995). Effects of a computer-supported intentional learning environment (CSILE) on students’ self-concept, self-regulatory behavior, and critical thinking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(4), 375-385.

Schaps, E., & Lewis, C. (1999). Perils on an essential journey: Building school community, Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 215-218.

SETDA – School Education Technology Directors’ Association (2003). National Leadership Institute Toolkit, Table 2. Retrieved from: www.setda.org/NLItoolkit/tla/tla05.htm

Shavelson, R.J., Baxter, G.P., & Gao, X. (1993). Sampling variability of performance assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 215-232.

Shavelson, R.J., Baxter, G.P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessments in science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 347-362.

Snow, D. (2003). Classroom strategies for helping at-risk students, Noteworthy Perspective. Midcontinent Research for Education and Learning, available from www.mcrel.org

SRI International (2001, March). Silicon Valley Challenge 2000: Year 5 Multimedia Project Report l, SRI Project 7970.

Sumrall, W.J. (2003, November). Real-world ratios: Modeling and scaling using a spreadsheet. Learning and Leading with Technology, 31(3), 14-17.

Sweet, D. (1993). Performance Assessment. Office of Education Research Consumer Guide. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Swengel, E. M. (1991). Peer tutoring: Back to the roots of peer helping. The Peer Facilitator Quarterly, 8(4), 28-32. techLearning, (2004, January 5-16). http://www.techlearning.com/instantpoll/archive.jhtml

Tomlinson, C.A. (1999). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

U.S. Department of Education Technical Research Report (August, 1995), Technology and education reform: Technical research report, Volume 1: Findings and Conclusions (OERI). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.

U.S. Department of Education Educational Technology Expert Panel, Exemplary and Promising Educational Technology Programs, Office of Education Research and Improvement, (2002, February). See http://genyes.org/products/geny/genyresearch.

Vanderbilt Cognition and Technology Group. (1992). The Jasper Series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 291-315.

Viadero, D., Studies Show Peer Mentoring Yields Benefits for Students, Edweek.org, July 9, 2003, http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2003/07/09/42peer.h22.html

Wangsatorntanakhun, J. (2002), Designing Performance Assessments: Challenges for the Three- Story Intellect, Redeemer International School Thailand, Bangkok, www.geocitties.,com/Athens/Parthenon/8658/.

Weinberger, E. (2003), “Applying the LCPs to High School Education,” The Ohio State University, College of Education, Gale Group.

Wheatley, M. J. (1999a). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Wheatley, M. J. (1999b, July). Reclaiming hope: The new story is ours to tell. Summer Institute, University of Utah.

Wheatley, M. J., & Kellner-Rogers, M. (1996). A simpler way. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler PublisherS Corp.

Wheatley, M. J., & Kellner-Rogers, M. (1998, April, May). Bringing life to organizational change, Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, 5-13.

Wiggins, G. (1996, December–1997, January). Practicing what we preach in designing authentic assessments. Educational Leadership, 18-25.

Willis, J., & Crowder, J. (1974, January). Does tutoring enhance the tutor’s academic learning? Psychology in the Schools, 11(1), 68-70. EJ 092 500

Wolfe, P., & Sorgen, M. (1990). Mind, memory, and learning. Napa, CA: Pat Guild Associates.